> > It also used in unaccepted(yet?) udhcpc 6RD support patch from OpenWRT > > https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/package/busybox/patches/244-udhcpc_add _6rd_option.patch > > Hmm. I applied that patch to git.
Two little additions: Shouldn't it be as feature and depend on IPV6? http://code.google.com/p/wl500g/source/browse/trunk/busybox/303-udhcp-6rd.pa tch#22 Next, http://www.comcast6.net/ ISP uses its own 6rd option number 0x96 with same format and purpose as 0xd4 from RFC. Almost the same story as with rfc 0x79 and ms 0xf9 static routes. Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
