> bb_daemonize should double-fork so it isn't a session leader, and hence > doesn't get a controlling tty on Linux if a tty is ever opened, similar to > how libdaemon's daemon_fork or the big start-stop-daemon does it.
Seriously. I would very much like to see *less* work done on obsolete approaches like daemonization, auto-forking and other horrors such as start-stop-daemon, and *more* work done towards adoption of real daemon management frameworks such as s6, runit, daemontools, or even Upstart or (God help us all) systemd. -- Laurent _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
