On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Alexander Kriegisch <[email protected]> wrote: > walter harms, 12.12.2011 15:23: >> please cc: this to busybox.net > > I just clicked "reply". Why was the reply-to header wrong in the first > place? I did not send it to your e-mail on purpose. > >>> I asked about one option, not 600+. Besides, in our project we had >>> a >> >> you are right but saying "yes" is equivalent to say: we want a config >> option to enable/disable every option in every applet. > > No, it is not. You fear an avalanche of other people saying "me too" for > their respective favourite BB apps, but there is no indicator that this > will happen.
I think the rule should be: * if feature requires little code, it shouldn't be an option. else, * if it is big, it should be either - a separate option, if feature is essential to some tasks, or - be hidden under ENABLE_DESKTOP option, if it can be easily substituted by other options/commands. If you want something to become an option, it's best to send a patch ;) which makes it happen. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
