>>>>> "Natanael" == Natanael Copa <[email protected]> writes:
Hi, Natanael> I have got a new challenge with udev. Since version 176 devtmpfs is Natanael> *required* in kernel[1]. As I understand this will not work very well Natanael> with mdev, our primary /dev handler. Is that a problem? Devtmpfs doesn't add much bloat to the kernel and is very nice. Natanael> Unfortunally, if you want/need hotplugging in xorg today you don't Natanael> have any choices. Natanael> I wonder if it would be difficult to add devtmpfs support to Natanael> mdev? As I understand, mdev will no longer need do mknod, but Natanael> will only need to set permissions and create symlinks. Maybe Natanael> also remove device nodes. Yes, if we change the permissions / rename, then we afaik need to remove the nodes ourselves. What exactly is the problem with using mdev together with devtmpfs? (I always use pure devtmpfs on the embedded devices, but don't right away see what the problem is). -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
