> > I am not convinced .txz and .tlzma extensions are common. > > (In my opinion, existence of .tgz extension was a mistake). > > They exist, and GNU tar handles them, so I think bb tar shouldn't puke > when it sees one. Busybox does handle .tgz and .tbz2, because they have > the magic detection already written (xz magic is marked todo in > archival/libarchive/get_header_tar.c).
Replying to myself, but I just remembered all Slackware tarballs are named .txz (changed in 2009 from tgz). Perhaps that's worth something for the "common" argument. :) - Lauri -- http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
