[re-send to list because reply-to header was wrong as usual] I tried before even installing bash for the first time in my clean system, that is not the problem.
Alexander Kriegisch Am 01.03.2012 um 14:58 schrieb "[email protected]" <[email protected]>: >> I tried the same thing with a real bash binary replacing the symlink >> to busybox, and mc subshell support immediately works as expected - >> same busybox and mc binaries. >> >> Any ideas? > > Another hint: If there is a real bash and that one is reachable and > activated by any script or other command the mc subshell fails using > ash. It only worked for me when bash got completely replaced with ash > on the system. The reason for this seamed to be a shared library > (probably readline but unverified). ... and don't use symlink for the > shell. mc doesn't liked them (but that may have changed with versions). > The problem was that mc used realpath to find out the real executables > name and then checked against that name if it is bash or something else > (same for Busybox and applet sym linking - use hard links or script). > > -- > Harald _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
