On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:02:20PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > I really don't understand this deference to the limitations of > util-linux. If we have a spec we should document and justify deviations > from the spec. But when all we have is some example implementation, they > can be _wrong_. It doesn't _matter_ what they do, what matters is that > we get the behavior right.
I don't think it's deference but desire to avoid breaking things. Some people setup loop devices manually with losetup, and don't want them automatically deleted, or even just don't expect the automatic deletion. For example: dev=$(losetup -f --show "$file") mkfs "$dev" mount "$dev" "$mountpoint" ... umount "$dev" dd if=/dev/zero of="$dev" losetup -d "$dev" With the automatic loop deletion, this code has a DANGEROUS race condition. Note that the automatic loop deletion is safe if you can determine that the loop device was auto-created by mount, but it's extremely unsafe when it was manually created by losetup. Rich _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
