On Thursday 10 May 2012 23:00:06 Guylhem wrote: > Hello > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Sven-Göran Bergh > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think that many of the reactions to the OTP patch confuse > > it with an entire OTP framework: client, server, all kinds > > of delivery utils, etc. It is not! It is just the most > > essential part of the server needed to generate the PIN and > > verifying the response. Nothing else, lean and simple. > > I was a bit tired after reading some the reactions (some of which > seeming to indicate the submitted code wasn't even read), and figured > I'd just give up. > > But your message is a perfect sum up and raised my spirits :-) > > Again, we don't need everything, just the crucial part. Here we have > the server at the most important point (login), and a pin_floyd > function to generate PINs in the best possible way. Deliver them any > way you want. Add pin_floyd calls to existing applets, or create new > applets to do that if you want. undefine that and you won't even know > there is some OTP feature. > > What's the procedure at this point to have this updated > correct_password.c included? who should I submit the patch to? > > Guylhem
Hi, submit your patch to the mailing list with [PATCH] in the subject line. Ciao, Tito _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
