> In addition Busybox build process shall create an extra text file with > full (and may be extended) copyright message. This file shall be > installed under /usr/share/doc/busybox-VERSION/Copyright, and all > system maintainers shall be forced to put this file on the final > binary system, except if size constrains forbid this (e.g. initramfs). > In such cases the system maintainer shall be forced to publish the > full copyright message on a different way (e.g. web site or system > documentation).
Not to troll or anything, but this strikes me oddly as reinventing the Original BSD license's advertising clause, which has been flagged as *obnoxious* and fought so valiantly by GPL zealots: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html So, would that "copyright publishing obligation" be compatible with the GPL, or would it also be deemed obnoxious ? -- Laurent _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
