On 04/01/2013 08:30 PM, Piotr Karbowski wrote:
I tried to test new busybox and it does segfault hard for me, it used to
work with 1.21.0 but it does not work anymore. After enabling debuging
symbols and using gdb I have:

### output of 1_21_0 tag:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000357fbb8abda in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00000357fbb8abda in ?? ()
#1  0x0000000000406648 in index_in_strings (strings=0x408e0d <keywords>
"add", key=0x0)
     at libbb/compare_string_array.c:27
#2  0x0000000000404ea5 in mdev_main (argc=1, argv=0x3890354b1f8)
     at util-linux/mdev.c:1064
#3  0x00000000004021b8 in main (argc=1, argv=0x3890354b1f8) at
libbb/appletlib.c:812
###

### the strace ./busybox output:
execve("./busybox", ["./busybox"], [/* 73 vars */]) = 0
uname({sys="Linux", node="sabre", ...}) = 0
brk(0)                                  = 0x258b1c0
brk(0x258c380)                          = 0x258c380
arch_prctl(ARCH_SET_FS, 0x258ba40)      = 0
brk(0x25ad380)                          = 0x25ad380
brk(0x25ae000)                          = 0x25ae000
open("/dev/null", O_RDWR)               = 3
close(3)                                = 0
umask(0)                                = 077
chdir("/dev")                           = 0
--- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SEGV_MAPERR, si_addr=0} ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
zsh: segmentation fault  strace ./busybox
###

The tag 1_20_2 from git does work. I tried to downgrade gcc from 4.7.2
to 4.6.3 and the result is the same. Config attached.

The system is ~amd64 gentoo, libtool 2.4.2, glibc 2.16.0, linux-headers
3.8.

When added switch -s or --help it does not segfault. That could be root case of my other issue with /dev/snd/* permissions after boot that could be fixed with re-running mdev -s after the coldplug script was executed to load modules, then, propably mdev as hotplug agent was segfaulting and not setting permissions.

-- Piotr.
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to