On 6/3/2013 12:36 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Please excuse my interfering... Did you verify that the version with xstrtou is indeed shorter (which was the motivation for the change, if I understood right)? I doubt it. Besides that, the version with sscanf is far more readable.
My motivation for the change was that a core busybox developer told me to use xstrtou instead of sscanf :). I updated my patch to do so, and for the sake of consistency made the extra effort to go back and convert the existing code so it would match.
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
