On Monday 03 June 2013 06:41:11 Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > On Fri, 31 May 2013 14:46:51 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday 31 May 2013 10:43:17 Jon Schneider wrote: > > > Thank you for making this work and please don't let anyone tell you to > > > start using GNU autoconf and friends. They're absolute crap for most > > > packages when cross building. > > > > not to go way off topic for this list, but that's not really true. > > autotools tends to work a lot more reliably than > > $random-build-system-of-the-day. i spend more time fixing non-autotool > > packages to cross-compile properly than autotool ones. > > Completely agree. > > As far as cross-compilation is concerned, autotools-based or > CMake-based packages are *way* much easier to handle than any > hand-written build system.
i guess you haven't built any semi-complicated cmake-based packages :). suggest *not* poking around /usr/share/cmake/Modules/ unless you want to cry and die inside. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
