Applied, thanks!

On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski
<[email protected]> wrote:
> GCC complained about since_last_update being set but not used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
> ---
>  networking/ntpd.c |    4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/networking/ntpd.c b/networking/ntpd.c
> index c4b0187..f1f99bb 100644
> --- a/networking/ntpd.c
> +++ b/networking/ntpd.c
> @@ -1328,7 +1328,9 @@ update_local_clock(peer_t *p)
>  #if !USING_KERNEL_PLL_LOOP
>         double freq_drift;
>  #endif
> +#if !USING_KERNEL_PLL_LOOP || USING_INITIAL_FREQ_ESTIMATION
>         double since_last_update;
> +#endif
>         double etemp, dtemp;
>
>         abs_offset = fabs(offset);
> @@ -1356,7 +1358,9 @@ update_local_clock(peer_t *p)
>          * action is and defines how the system reacts to large time
>          * and frequency errors.
>          */
> +#if !USING_KERNEL_PLL_LOOP || USING_INITIAL_FREQ_ESTIMATION
>         since_last_update = recv_time - G.reftime;
> +#endif
>  #if !USING_KERNEL_PLL_LOOP
>         freq_drift = 0;
>  #endif
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> busybox mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to