Yes. Because I am not convinced we need it enabled.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Vladislav Grishenko <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Denys, > Thanks, but filter code is still disabled > > diff --git a/networking/udhcp/dhcpc.c b/networking/udhcp/dhcpc.c > --- a/networking/udhcp/dhcpc.c > +++ b/networking/udhcp/dhcpc.c > @@ -990,7 +990,6 @@ static int udhcp_raw_socket(int ifindex) > sock.sll_ifindex = ifindex; > xbind(fd, (struct sockaddr *) &sock, sizeof(sock)); > > -#if 0 /* Several users reported breakage when BPF filter is used */ > if (CLIENT_PORT == 68) { > /* Use only if standard port is in use */ > /* > @@ -1041,7 +1040,6 @@ static int udhcp_raw_socket(int ifindex) > sizeof(filter_prog)) >= 0) > log1("Attached filter to raw socket fd"); // log? > } > -#endif > > if (setsockopt(fd, SOL_PACKET, PACKET_AUXDATA, > &const_int_1, sizeof(int)) < 0 > -- > 1.7.2.5 > > Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko > > _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
