Bryan Evenson wrote:
Well, this is leading into some interesting questions about
responsibility. I reported my results on the linux-arm-kernel mailing
list, and it is possible I uncovered a bug in the Atmel RTC driver.
I'll know a little more by this time tomorrow on that issue. I'd say
Busybox should have reasonable assumptions about the kernel interfaces
acting as documented. If that's the case, I'm not sure there is a need
for this patch. Any thoughts? Either way, I'll report if I find out if
a RTC driver bug was the root cause of my problems.
It is most likely a problem related to the platform because others
couldn't reproduce in on PC hardware.
Also it is by definition a kernel bug if a process enters a state where
if can't be killed.
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
