On Tuesday, November 04, 2014 01:58 AM, Steven Honeyman wrote:
On 3 November 2014 05:25, Chris Ruehl <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I was in need to have f2fs support in busybox.
This patchset based on f2fs-tools commit
056e4b04fc44a006d5529bafbf87b1d73296c665
[Patch v1.1][f2fs] add build support
[Patch v1.2][f2fs] add libs header
[Patch v1.3][f2fs] add libs c-files
Please feel free to use it.
Chris
Hi Chris,
I can't give an answer for the "official" maintainers, but in case you
noticed my unofficial testing branch and wondered why I haven't added
your contribution:
Rather than patching makefiles, there's a script that runs and adds
new applets so that everything can be in one file together. There's
some good documentation in docs/new-applet-HOWTO.txt which explains
this.
Another reason is it looks like (apologies if I'm wrong) it's some
already written programs that don't fit with the busybox design, for
example free() is called many times with no surrounding ifdefs; and a
lot of functionality may be repeated from libbb, or even just the
malloc -> xmalloc type of changes.
Thanks,
Steven
Steven,
Thank you get back to me. I pretty much appreciated your advice. I will get
to the HOWTO.
In general the 2 functions mkfs and fsck working, so fix the design issues
should be a matter of a day or two.
Yes, Im using libbb, changed already some function calls from original code.
e.g. generate_uuid(); I dig a bit further..
I'd had a quick look what the meaning of the x<functions>, and it makes sense to
me. About the ifdefs around free's I didn't get it!?
I have some time between my production and work it out.
Chris
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
