On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Rich Felker <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:16:02PM -0500, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote: >> On 02/15/2015 06:06 AM, Steven Honeyman wrote: >> >On 15 February 2015 at 07:38, Explorer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>This is a trivial change to allow a 5-digit-or-more year in 'ls' timestamp >> >>output. >> >> >> >>Signed-off-by: Kang-che Sung <explorer09-at-gmail.com> >> > >> >You realise we're good for almost 8000 more years? :D >> >> I guess it can already happen if your clock is grossly miscalibrated, though? > > Only on systems with 64-bit time_t. Otherwise years past 2038 don't > exist. :-)
BTW: Current kernels internally use 64-bit nanosecond time, and they refuse to set date such that it overflows such counters. I failed to set date to year 2300. 2200 worked. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
