On 12.03.2015 19:38, Michael Conrad wrote:
On 3/12/2015 12:04 PM, Harald Becker wrote:
but that one will only work when you either use the kernel hotplug
helper mechanism, or the netlink approach. You drop out those who
can't / doesn't want to use either.
...which I really do think could be answered in one paragraph :-) If the
netlink socket is the "right way" to solve the forkbomb problem that
happens with hotplug helpers, then why would anyone want to solve it the
wrong way? I don't understand the need.
Michael,
ohh, good question! ... ask Isaac! (answer in one paragraph?)
In General: We are not living in a uniform world, where every person
handle things in the same way ... peoples preferences are different ...
for whatever reason ...
In Detail: I'm not a philosopher, but it sounds to me more like a "what
is the sense of Live?" question ... that mean I can't give you the
definitive answer to this question
In Practical: We can have a simpler version, when we chose the netlink
approach and Natanaels cold plug trigger function, but then others will
complain (see Isaac).
Conclusion: As I accept different preferences, and I do not want to
force others more than possible, I tried to find a solution which allows
every required mechanism (with maximum code sharing), and let the user
chose which one to use. In addition BB has a config system which allows
to disable unwanted stuff, so you can opt out the hotplug stuff when you
like.
... but still Isaac insist on using the old (suffering) mdev version and
prefers an error known system over some imvrovements and innovation :(
--
Harald
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
