El viernes, 13 de marzo de 2015, James Bowlin <[email protected]> escribió:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 08:33 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia said: > > You are talking about a possible bug in the current > > implementation. In my opinion this is completely independent > > from whether a redesign/architecture change is required or > > wanted. > > ISTM you are assuming the redesign will not fix the bug. No, I am not asumming that. I am saying: if there is a bug then let's fix it. The discussion on whether mdev needs a redesign is independent of that. In other words I am saying that "there is a bug" is not in itself a reason to do a redesign. If the > different versions are runtime options then it will be easy to > see if the new versions fix the bug or not. Let's make it easy > for me to see if your assumption is correct or not. There was no such assumption. [...] > the only sane > approach is to let the choice be at runtime so there is a > fallback in case there is a bug that only shows up on specific > hardware. This approach seems so obvious to me that I can't > imagine it is controversial. No controversy on my side. In fact I am not advocating compile time options over runtime options, nor the opposite. I was just trying to understand why Michael's proposal was not good enough for Harald. Guillermo -- Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia [email protected]
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
