> Von: Denys Vlasenko [mailto:[email protected]]
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. Mai 2015 18:48
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:36 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Whose policy is that which caters to a certain compiler option's inept 
> > warnings? "What are
> the goals of Busybox?" (http://www.busybox.net/FAQ.html#goals) says: "We also 
> want to have
> the simplest and cleanest implementation we can manage..." - I wouldn't say 
> that
> >
> > #if defined(__BIONIC__) && defined(_FILE_OFFSET_BITS) && _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 
> > == 64
> >
> > is as simple and clean as
> >
> > #if defined(__BIONIC__) && _FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64
>
> But the former lets compiler catch a typo...

How's that? The way I see it, the former provides even more opportunities of 
making uncatched typos, e. g.

#if defined(__BIONIC__) && defined(__FILE_OFFSET_BITS) && _FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 
64
--
Best regards,
Dietmar Schindler
________________________________
manroland web systems GmbH -- Managing Director: Joern Gosse
Registered Office: Augsburg -- Trade Register: AG Augsburg -- HRB-No.: 26816 -- 
VAT: DE281389840

Confidentiality note:
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or 
dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this eMail in error, then please delete this eMail.

! Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this eMail !
________________________________
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to