Test explicitly for REOPEN flags:  update_num_lines is called
unconditionally so (num_lines != NOT_REGULAR_FILE) is also true when
num_lines contains a valid number of lines.

The call to fstat doesn't need to be in #if ENABLE_FEATURE_LESS_FLAGS:
the whole function is already in such a test.

Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <[email protected]>
---
 miscutils/less.c | 16 +++++-----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/miscutils/less.c b/miscutils/less.c
index be8d20e..7a441bf 100644
--- a/miscutils/less.c
+++ b/miscutils/less.c
@@ -615,11 +615,12 @@ static int safe_lineno(int fline)
 static void update_num_lines(void)
 {
        int count, fd;
+       struct stat stbuf;
        ssize_t len, i;
        char buf[4096];
 
        /* only do this for regular files */
-       if (num_lines != NOT_REGULAR_FILE) {
+       if (num_lines == REOPEN_AND_COUNT || num_lines == REOPEN_STDIN) {
                count = 0;
                fd = open("/proc/self/fd/0", O_RDONLY);
                if (fd < 0 && num_lines == REOPEN_AND_COUNT) {
@@ -631,17 +632,10 @@ static void update_num_lines(void)
                        num_lines = NOT_REGULAR_FILE;
                        return;
                }
-#if ENABLE_FEATURE_LESS_FLAGS
-               {
-                       struct stat stbuf;
-                       if (fstat(fd, &stbuf) != 0
-                        || !S_ISREG(stbuf.st_mode)
-                       ) {
-                               num_lines = NOT_REGULAR_FILE;
-                               goto do_close;
-                       }
+               if (fstat(fd, &stbuf) != 0 || !S_ISREG(stbuf.st_mode)) {
+                       num_lines = NOT_REGULAR_FILE;
+                       goto do_close;
                }
-#endif
                while ((len = safe_read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0) {
                        for (i = 0; i < len; ++i) {
                                if (buf[i] == '\n' && ++count == MAXLINES)
-- 
2.4.3

_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to