OK, I will send the new patch ASAP Le 3 févr. 2016 18:39, "Mike Frysinger" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On 03 Feb 2016 12:45, Daniel Thompson wrote: > > On 03/02/16 12:29, Nicolas CARRIER wrote: > > > Honestly, I hesitated to propose the inverse feature. > > > I think the key point is : what we consider "normal" behavior ? > > > I tend to consider it's "keep your arguments as they were passed to > > > you", but I felt there was more people favoring the "do as you've > > > always done". > > > > Defaults are enough to handle "normal" behavior; inverting the > > definition of a feature isn't helpful. > > > > It is far better (and more intuitive) if: feature off -> smaller code > > naming wise, FEATURE_INIT_MODIFY_CMDLINE is fine. the "default" value > can be easily used to set the state regardless of naming and inverted. > > i have no strong opinion either way as to the default. disabling the > munging by default does yield smaller code. > -mike >
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
