On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> When strings are abbreviated the new find_applet_by_name() is about > >>> 34% slower than currently. (All comparisons are for the default > >>> configuration.) > >> > >> Crazy :D > > > > Is this really worth it? 34% slower may have a visible impact if applets > are > > executed frequently. And then there's the added complexity. All of that > for > > just some 500 bytes ? > > In busybox land, 500 bytes are not small. > > However, I also think that this idea is slightly too insane... > I wondered if I was reading an entry for the underhanded C contest. Sam
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
