Hello,
makes sense.
Thanks for explaining this.
Cheers

On 29 May 2016 at 00:57, John Schroeder <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Vito,
>
> From what I understand, you need to add a "Signed-off-by" line to your
> patches if you want your name/email attached to your patch. Otherwise, the
> busybox devs will keep your patch anonymous since some people wish to
> remain so by default. You can look at some previously submitted patches to
> see how others did this.
>
> --John Schroeder
>
> Thanks.
> Not complaining but I would have expected to be quoted in the commit.
> Not a big deal, it was a small patch.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Thursday, 26 May 2016, Denys Vlasenko < <[email protected]>
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Fixed in git, thanks!
>>
>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Vito Mulè <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > friendly ping
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: Vito Mulè <[email protected]>
>> > Date: 16 May 2016 at 18:16
>> > Subject: Fwd: bug 8926 - Arping dropping leading 0 from mac address
>> > To: [email protected]
>> >
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> > not sure if this is necessary since I've opened the bug already,
>> apologies
>> > in case it's not.
>> > Bug link: https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=8926
>> >
>> >
>> > Not sure if this is intende but busybox arping is not consistent with
>> arping
>> > on linux, printing MAC addressed.
>> >
>> >
>> > root@agent4:/home/vmule# arping 192.168.1.159
>> > ARPING 192.168.1.159
>> > 60 bytes from 08:00:27:86:47:9d (192.168.1.159): index=0 time=1.002 sec
>> >
>> > and this is busybox arping
>> > root@agent4:/home/vmule# busybox arping 192.168.1.159
>> > ARPING to 192.168.1.159 from 192.168.1.157 via eth0
>> > Unicast reply from 192.168.1.159 [8:0:27:86:47:9d] 0.314ms
>> >
>> > I wrote a small patch to fix it:
>> >
>> >
>> > diff --git a/networking/arping.c b/networking/arping.c
>> > index 6b0de4d..2b22451 100644
>> > --- a/networking/arping.c
>> > +++ b/networking/arping.c
>> > @@ -230,12 +230,15 @@ static void recv_pack(unsigned char *buf, int len,
>> > struct sockaddr_ll *FROM)
>> >         }
>> >         if (!(option_mask32 & QUIET)) {
>> >                 int s_printed = 0;
>> > +               struct ether_addr* mac = (struct ether_addr *) p;
>> >
>> > -               printf("%scast re%s from %s [%s]",
>> > +               printf("%scast re%s from %s
>> [%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x]
>> > ",
>> >                         FROM->sll_pkttype == PACKET_HOST ? "Uni" :
>> "Broad",
>> >                         ah->ar_op == htons(ARPOP_REPLY) ? "ply" :
>> "quest",
>> >                         inet_ntoa(src_ip),
>> > -                       ether_ntoa((struct ether_addr *) p));
>> > +                       mac->ether_addr_octet[0],
>> mac->ether_addr_octet[1],
>> > +                       mac->ether_addr_octet[2],
>> mac->ether_addr_octet[3],
>> > +                       mac->ether_addr_octet[4],
>> mac->ether_addr_octet[5]);
>> >                 if (dst_ip.s_addr != src.s_addr) {
>> >                         printf("for %s ", inet_ntoa(dst_ip));
>> >                         s_printed = 1;
>> > @@ -243,8 +246,11 @@ static void recv_pack(unsigned char *buf, int len,
>> > struct sockaddr_ll *FROM)
>> >                 if (memcmp(p + ah->ar_hln + 4, me.sll_addr,
>> ah->ar_hln)) {
>> >                         if (!s_printed)
>> >                                 printf("for ");
>> > -                       printf("[%s]",
>> > -                               ether_ntoa((struct ether_addr *) p +
>> > ah->ar_hln + 4));
>> > +                       struct ether_addr* mac2 = mac + ah->ar_hln + 4;
>> > +                       printf("[%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x]",
>> > +                               mac2->ether_addr_octet[0],
>> > mac2->ether_addr_octet[1],
>> > +                               mac2->ether_addr_octet[2],
>> > mac2->ether_addr_octet[3],
>> > +                               mac2->ether_addr_octet[4],
>> > mac2->ether_addr_octet[5]);
>> >                 }
>> >
>> >                 if (last) {
>> >
>> >
>> > Ideas?
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > busybox mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> busybox mailing 
> [email protected]http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to