Denys Vlasenko wrote: >The problem with that is currently "busyboxANYTHING" >is treated as "busybox" too. Making "busybox an ordinary applet >will break that, no?
It will. Does that matter? It's not a feature I've ever used. Ron _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
