On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:26 AM, ChenQi <qi.c...@windriver.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Is there any new feature in new version of busybox that would probably > increase the binary size? > > With the same configuration, busybox 1.26.1 is about 15% larger than 1.24.1. > I compared the utilities by checking busybox.links, they are the same > between these two versions. > > -rw-r--r-- 2 chenqi chenqi 420K Jan 6 14:04 > tmp/deploy/rpm/core2_64/busybox-1.26.1-r0.core2_64.rpm > > -rw-r--r-- 4 chenqi chenqi 366K Dec 27 18:07 > tmp/deploy/rpm/core2_64/busybox-1.24.1-r0.core2_64.rpm > > By the way, I used the same compiler, same flags, etc. The only difference > is the busybox version. > > Could somebody give me some information why this would occur?
Please post your .configs and busybox_unstripped.map files from both versions. busybox_unstripped.map can be found in the build tree after build. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
