Klaaßen, Fynn (LAWO) <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess, there is a trivial bug when using busybox top: > > BusyBox v1.22.1 (Ubuntu 1:1.22.0-15ubuntu1) multi-call binary: > > Mem: 3278296K used, 1236784K free, 0K shrd, 35373432K buff, 140001458828604 K > cached
This has been fixed a while ago in | 7df1f1dda1f997c44800d16a9a12cf6cae2ed7e7 is the first bad commit | commit 7df1f1dda1f997c44800d16a9a12cf6cae2ed7e7 | Author: Timo Teräs <[email protected]> | Date: Mon Jul 21 14:14:24 2014 +0300 | | top: fix and merge code to parse /proc/meminfo Unfortunately, the version of busybox shipped in Debian/Ubuntu is fairly outdated. This however is going to change soon-ish. For the time being, just a typo reported by Debian's obnoxious lint checker "lintian": I: busybox-static: spelling-error-in-binary bin/busybox compatiblity compatibility (That's in util-linux/fdisk.c) Cheers, Christoph _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
