Hi,

> There also checks for GCC_COMBINE, but it does the opposite of your patch.

Sorry, my bad. It does the same! :/

Cheers,
Xabier Oneca_,,_

--
Que te lo pases bien,
xOneca_,,_


2018-01-18 23:02 GMT+01:00 Xabier Oneca  --  xOneca <[email protected]>:
> Hello,
>
> 2018-01-18 22:48 GMT+01:00 Yunlian Jiang <[email protected]>:
>> My question is.
>>    the  ash_ptr_to_globals_misc, ash_ptr_to_globals_memstack and
>> ash_ptr_to_globals_var
>> are defined in ash_ptr_hack.c as normal pointers. But in ash.c, they are
>> declared as const
>> pointers. What is the benefit of doing that?
>
> Maybe same purpose as ptr_to_globals?
>
> https://git.busybox.net/busybox/tree/libbb/ptr_to_globals.c#n13
>
> There also checks for GCC_COMBINE, but it does the opposite of your patch.
>
> Cheers,
> Xabier Oneca_,,_
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to