We had some bash scripts that we converted to use busybox ash as bash (removed any array constructs) and when comparing the two scripts - it seems that running them under busybox yields less idle time compared to bash.
I was expecting that busybox would (itself) take up more time simply because of vfork, but yield more CPU time overall since there would be less overhead as a number of the applets would not fork&exec. Is this expected behavior that busybox overall yields less idle time? -Jim _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
