26.02.2019, 11:20, "Denys Vlasenko" <[email protected]>:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:46 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  From: Andrey Mazo <[email protected]>
>>
>>  Currently, running "udhcpc -n -b" causes udhcpc to go to background and
>>  then exit after some time unless a lease is obtained.
>>
>>  It's not very useful to do so
>>  as the calling process doesn't know
>>  if the lease was obtained or not anyway.
>>
>>  The code actually tries to favor "-b" over "-n",
>>  but doesn't clear "-n" flag while clearing "-b" after backgrounding.
>>
>>  So, clear "-n" flag after going into background.
>>  This effectively makes "-b" override "-n" completely
>>  and "-n -b" behave the same as "-b".
>>
>>  This allows to override default "-n" option, passed to udhcpc by ifupdown,
>>  without recompiling busybox.
>
> To clarify: the goal is to deal with this situation:
>
> config IFUPDOWN_UDHCPC_CMD_OPTIONS
>         string "ifup udhcpc command line options"
>         default "-R -n"
>
> And %udhcpc_opts% only can _add_ options, not remove -n
>
> Thus, with default IFUPDOWN_UDHCPC_CMD_OPTIONS, -n is always passed?
> This is the problem?

Yes, exactly.

An alternative solution is obviously to recompile busybox with 
IFUPDOWN_UDHCPC_CMD_OPTIONS="-R -b",
but it may not be always feasible (like in my case).

Would changing the defaults for IFUPDOWN_UDHCPC_CMD_OPTIONS to "-R -b" be a 
reasonable thing to do?
For example, yocto uses "-R -b" [1, 2].
If so, I can quickly cook up the patch.

[1] 
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox.inc#n131
[2] https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6339

Thank you,
Andrey.
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to