> > Your suggestion is pretty smart. But I don't know... If it were a more > > popular option maybe. But I don't like it 'half baked'. > > > > This option being neither popular[citation needed] nor part of the > > standard, if I had to vote I would reject it entirely. I'm guilty of > > featuritis. Sorry. :) > > My proposal would make all _valid_ uses of --time XYZ to work > properly, with minimum of code. > > It would work incorrectly only for invalid XYZs, > there are far fewer people who would care about that.
Well... You have the last word. If you feel like it's worth it, go for it. We'll shave bytes from other places to compensate... ;) Cheers, Xabier Oneca_,,_ _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
