Hi Ron, It's probably worth pointing out the patches are nearly a year old. > I started from BusyBox commit 972e29881, otherwise there were problems > applying them. >
Yeah! They are pretty old. I did forgot that I sent those patches :P I just rebased the patches over the latest tree (fc7868602) and it merged without conflicts too. > Not to make it too easy for myself, though, I was working on the BusyBox > port to Microsoft Windows which I maintain[1]. Naturally this has many > tweaks to the build system. > That's a hard test for this patchset! :) The first three patches went in just fine. I did expect so. > The last two required careful > shepherding Expected too. Sorry. Could not find a better way to post these last two patches > but got there in the end. Cross compiling for Windows on > Linux worked fine, as did a POSIX build on Linux. That's good news! > I haven't tried a > native compilation on Windows yet. > > On the whole, this was less troublesome than I expected. > I appreciate your effort for review this patchset. If it gets merged, I have a couple more tangential improvements in the backlog to post... Cheers, Xabier Oneca_,,_
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
