Hmm...
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20230705180345._jjfk%[email protected]>:
|I just stumbled upon this a minute ago, 'have not looked around.
|No containers are such involved.
...
| #?0|kent:$ busybox.static pstree
| ?-+-2*[encfs]
||-sh---sleep
||-sleep
| `-tmux: server-+-bash---s-nail---less
||-bash---busybox.static
||-bash---git---git---less
||-3*[bash]
| `-vim
|
|Vs
....
| ?-+-?---startx.sh---xinit-+-Xorg---4*[{Xorg}]
|| `-cwm---st---tmux: client
||-encfs---4*[{encfs}]
||-encfs---2*[{encfs}]
||-sh---sleep
||-sleep
| `-tmux: server-+-bash---s-nail---less
||-bash---pstree
||-bash---git---git---less
||-3*[bash]
| `-vim---{vim}
Now that i look at it again after some hours, if that "2*[encfs]"
of busybox actually refers to
||-encfs---4*[{encfs}]
||-encfs---2*[{encfs}]
and likely it does, then it makes sense to me again, and it is
only that the X session as such is missing.
...
|but busybox ps(1) sees them
...
I do not know.
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
