> And it really is only that > > 6a0ba673820cb6880e2f93f739de7d16d45d2b26 > .. > - expr1->val = top_of_stack->val; > - expr1->var_name = NULL; > - return NULL; > + rez = top_of_stack->val; > + top_of_stack = expr1; > + goto ret_rez; > > thing? Pfff that hurts, really. I will have to look more > thoroughly when i have time for *that*!
So this stacking/unstacking (and a forced null value, loss of name if i understand the semantics of this), where are they located? if at the interface user-space and inner bb it helps, somewhat, understanding the big-names difficulty (which should be globally transparent, not just for the arithmtic thing (told you about the '[] && ||' similar behavior). Eventhough, does it take care of the non systematic outcomes (remamber that returning 0 and then 1 for the same expression/values, in the same, simple script(?). > Thank you. I will go cycling into the darkness.. Thanks for the exmple. Like you, i really should move out more this body of mine -sigh-. Noch einmal, vielen Danke JClu 202510142 _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
