Greetings, this probably got lost in the holiday slump.
Any views on this? Thanks! Leslie On Fri, Dec 19, 2025, at 5:11 PM, Leslie P. Polzer wrote: > Hi BusyBox maintainers, > > I’m preparing a small OSS-Fuzz integration effort for BusyBox > and wanted to check if you’d be open to fuzzing harnesses > living in-tree. > > The initial idea is a small directory with a `make fuzzers` target > (not built by default), and a couple of tiny harnesses focused on > libbb parsers (base64/base32 to start, then higher‑value parsers > like archives/volume_id/httpd parsing). > > OSS-Fuzz can then fuzz continuously at no cost, finding bugs > before they become active exploits. > > Would this be welcome upstream? Happy to answer any questions. > > Thanks, > > Leslie
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
