before a lot of people get excited about this image, i would like to 
see more convincing proof that these butterflies were indeed mating. 
usually you see genitalia pulled out a little bit when lycaenids mate 
(e.g., see 
http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~kunte/PhotographyPrintsSlides/pages/BrightBabulBlue.htm),
 
which is not the case here. were these really paired? does milind 
have other pictures of this mating, taken from different angles? he 
had earlier posted image of the Red Pierrot (Talicada nyseus) with 
the Common Pierrot (Castalius rosimon), claiming that they were 
mating, which again went unconfirmed. milind, i think you should 
provide more information and more pictures when you send such news.

btw, there was slight misidentification: the butterfly on the left is 
the Small Cupid (Chilades parrhasius), not the Plains Cupid (C. 
pandava).

At 7:57 PM +0530 1/13/09, Sachin Chorge wrote:
>Hi,
>It is an interspecific Breeding, We should observe the outcome. Will 
>it give rise to new Species, either of two, or none?
>
>Most probably "none" as in case of most interbreeds. It has to be checked.
>
>--
>Mr. Sachin V.C...............
>Mumbai, India.
><mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
>
>
>


-- 

Dr. Krushnamegh Kunte

Post-doctoral Research Fellow (Kronforst Lab)
FAS Center for Systems Biology
Harvard University
52 Oxford St
Northwest Lab Room 458.40-3
Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

Ph: (617) 496-0078
Cell: (512) 577-1370
Fax: (617) 495-2196
Email: [email protected] or [email protected]

Academic Website: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~kunte/AcademicsHome.htm
General Website: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~kunte/index.htm
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Enjoy
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to