On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > I would avoid "incubator" in the package structure. 'bval' sounds good to me.
+1 on that -M > > --kevan > On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:58 AM, Donald Woods wrote: > >> As part of the initial codebase bring up, we need to decide on what >> package name we want to use in place of the current com.agimatec package >> names. >> >> Either of the following would allow us to easily replace "incubator" >> with our TLP parent at graduation, like "commons" - >> org.apache.incubator.beanvalidation >> org.apache.incubator.bval >> or, we could keep it simple for now and worry about renaming again at >> graduation and go with one of - >> org.apache.bval >> org.apache.beanvalidation >> >> >> Thoughts? I'll open a JIRA to use for the renaming once we decide.... >> >> >> -Donald > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
