Hi all guys, thank you very much a lot for your feedbacks :) Gerhard, don't worry, by nature I always respect someone else's ideas and I appreciate very much your point of you, and let me explain why including this kind of extensions (not just Guice) is imho still a good idea: - added value: just providing the JSR303 core implementation could be a limit, the added value is in a serie of tools that other similar communities don't provide (yet); - reusability: if different communities start adding int their project similar features, makes sense centralizing the efforts in a single point where everybody interested can participate.
So I would be more than pleased to start importing my stuff in the sandbox place as Donald and Matthias suggested. Have a nice day, all the best, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Donald Woods <[email protected]> wrote: >> How about bringing it over into a sandbox area for now? I don't have > > +1 that's cool with me. > >> time to look into Guice right now, but sounds like a really good >> extension to get our project code out into more user hands. Also, that >> gives us time to sort out the main code package renames/reorg and build >> updates before we pull another module in. > > I agree! A set of "plain" extension would be sweet. Especially for > cutting-edge > stuff, such as Guice. > > I think Gerhard is "concerned" since MyFaces offers 303 extensions, for JSF. > But not everybody is using Faces ;-) > > So yes, there more "interesting" stuff we add, the better in order to > build a strong > (developer) community around BVAL. > > > -M >> >> >> -Donald >> >> >> On 3/19/10 5:12 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>> Hi Gerhard, >>> very nice to meet you :) I already started realizing a set of >>> google-guice providers and module that simplify the >>> javax.validation.Validator building and injection. >>> Moreover, I' would add a org.aopalliance.intercept.MethodInterceptor >>> that validates methods args input, raising an >>> org.apache.bval.ValidationException if there are >>> javax.validation.ConstraintViolation, and automate the AOP stuff >>> marking the interested methods with an hypothetical >>> @org.apache.bval.Validate annotation bound the in guice binder. >>> I've already realized the 80% of the code, if you all agree I could >>> start importing the classes in a separate module so we could finalize >>> it all together. >>> What do you think about it? Thanks a lot in advance, have a nice day!!! >>> Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Gerhard Petracek >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> hi simo, >>>> >>>> which features do you plan to support? >>>> i'm asking because we have a quite interesting situation concerning such >>>> integrations. >>>> (i'll provide further details later on.) >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> gerhard >>>> >>>> http://www.irian.at >>>> >>>> Your JSF powerhouse - >>>> JSF Consulting, Development and >>>> Courses in English and German >>>> >>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >>>> >>>> >>>> 2010/3/18 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> Hi all guys, >>>>> ver nice to meet everybody and sorry I joined the ML so late. A very >>>>> BIG "thanks a lot" to Niall who invited me to join this amazing >>>>> community, I hope I'll do my best to help Bean Validation growing up. >>>>> Even if the codebase has just been imported, I'd like to propose to >>>>> develop also 3rd part libraries integration, I already started >>>>> developing a JSR303-Google Guice integration and this would be the >>>>> best place to share it. What do you think about it? >>>>> Thanks a lot in advance, all the best, >>>>> Simo >>>>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >
