On 3/23/10 9:36 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all BVAL folks! :) > - about the sandbox, during the past weekend I started committing an > integration module with google-guice; for now I just integrated the > JSR303 APIs. > > - about the doc, if we want to publish the bval site, I'm able to > customize the maven site skin, but unfortunately I'm not a graphic > designer, so if you can provide me a template I'd be more than pleased > to work on our public site.
Cool. We'll probably only be using maven-site as a secondary/sub site, so people can access the Javadoc and build reports. The main project website will be generated from our Confluence space. I have the ToDo to setup the initial Confluence space with the needed Nav sections, so the autoexport template will work. I'll also take a stab at an initial website theme, but I'm sure we'll want to hold a competition later on for our logo. > > WDYT? Thanks in advance, have a nice day! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Gerhard Petracek > <[email protected]> wrote: >> @svn: >> yes - i know the svn-folder. i just mean a jira component. >> so we can describe a finished feature there and i just have to send the link >> to the eg mailing list. >> >> @docs: >> can we use the export feature? e.g. at the geronimo site the pdf-export >> doesn't work right now. >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> http://www.irian.at >> >> Your JSF powerhouse - >> JSF Consulting, Development and >> Courses in English and German >> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> >> 2010/3/23 Donald Woods <[email protected]> >> >>> >>> >>> On 3/23/10 8:19 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote: >>>> hi @ all, >>>> >>>> what's about a sandbox module? >>> >>> Area in svn or JIRA component? >>> >>> We already have a sandbox area setup in svn at - >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/sandbox >>> >>>> we could use it for prototyping - esp. for features beyond the current >>> spec. >>>> as soon as a part of it is finished i would bring it to the eg for >>> further >>>> discussions. >>>> >>>> @docs: >>>> what do you think about a docbook based documentation? >>> >>> Personally, I'd prefer using Confluence for Docs, like we did for >>> Geronimo, which we could allow anyone with a CLA to help update. The >>> OpenJPA project uses docbook, which limits doc updates to committers and >>> doesn't get as much attention as it should. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> gerhard >>>> >>>> http://www.irian.at >>>> >>>> Your JSF powerhouse - >>>> JSF Consulting, Development and >>>> Courses in English and German >>>> >>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >>>> >>>> >>>> 2010/3/19 Donald Woods <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> I've created an initial release in the BVAL JIRA of - >>>>> 0.1-incubating >>>>> >>>>> I've also created some initial components, which I'm sure we'll add more >>>>> once we get rolling - >>>>> build >>>>> docs >>>>> jpa >>>>> jsf >>>>> jsr303 >>>>> samples >>>>> tck >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Donald >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
