Am 28.03.10 14:40, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi all guys,
package move has been done, I took advantage to update a small subset
of metadata on parent pom, according to new apache info.
Once terminated, I also reported the BVAL-11 issue that I wasn't able
to fix alone, as Kevan suggested I committed the code so the community
can help to resolve the issue.
One small question: is (agimatec) 0.9.6 version still fine for bval?
I'd propose to change it to 0.1-SNAPSHOT, how does it sound to you?
Best regards, have a nice Sunday!!!
Sim
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Simone Tripodi
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Donald,
I 100% support your idea, I'd raise the same question once terminated
this task :)
Thanks for your hint, going to commit in a while!!! :)
Have a nice Sunday,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Donald Woods<[email protected]> wrote:
I was thinking about collapsing everything into one artifact. The
current code structure is because agimatec-validation contains the core
engine/metadata handler, which was shared with pre-JSR303 code that
Agimatec had, while the agimatec-jsr303 was the add-on layer to fulfill
the spec requirements.
For now, lets rename the artifacts as:
agimatec-validation --> bval-core
agimatec-jsr303 --> bval-jsr303
We'll use another JIRA to combine everything or BVAL-1 to split things
into an impl and api jar.....
I'll try to take a look at the test failures tonight or tomorrow, but go
ahead with the commit and we'll figure it out from there.
Thanks,
Donald
On 3/27/10 1:14 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Kevan,
thank you very much for your feedbacks!!! I'm going to commit the code
at this status, I just need to know: if org.apache.bval fits well in
groupId, which artifacts Id do we have to use? Do you have any
suggestion?
Thanks a lot!!!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Kevan Miller<[email protected]> wrote:
On Mar 27, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all mates,
I'm going to complete the issue but I need you help for 2 small issues I have:
1) should I move also groupId and artifactId in poms?
Yes, I definitely think so.
2) in the jsr-303 module I've 28 failures over 81 tests, I attached on
this email the .txt junit reports, is anyone able to explain me why
they fail so I can fix them?
Sorry, I really haven't looked at the code at all, yet... IMO, it's absolutely
fine for you to commit the code in it's current form. At this stage, I don't
think anyone would object that the code has test failures. Plus committing will
allow others to help out... No reason for this to be solely on your shoulders.
Thanks for doing this!
--kevan
Hi Simone,
thanks for renaming! I fixed Issue 11, so that all tests are successful now.
Roman
