Go ahead and check it into trunk/bval-tck/ (drop the runner part of the name). Also, I noticed several files are missing the ASL 2.0 header (*.properties and *.xml) that will have to be added.
There is a file/directory that doesn't look like it's needed (beans.xml is empty) and should probably not be checked in - src/test/resources/org/jboss/testharness/impl/packaging/jsr299/default/beans.xml Once we have the code in, I'll update the pom.xml so we don't deploy any artifacts for that module. -Donald On 4/7/10 10:36 AM, Roman Stumm wrote: > Am 07.04.10 16:26, schrieb Kevan Miller: >> On Apr 7, 2010, at 4:08 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> >> >>> Hello Kevan, >>> >>> isn't the TCK for this "free" ? I think JBoss does that nowadays for >>> their "new" stuff. >>> >>> For instance, on OpenWebBeans we use this one: >>> http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/org/jboss/jsr299/tck/ >>> >> Yes. And I think what JBoss has done with these TCK's is fantastic. I >> wish all JCP projects would do this. >> >> This email was a followup to a question/concern that Donald raised in >> a recent Jira about public discussion of TCK results. I was only >> elaborating with additional information about JCP. >> >> I don't think BeanValidation needs to do anything differently. >> >> My only question would be what the project can claim, after passing >> all of the TCK tests. If we want to claim "Sun Certified", we might >> need to obtain the official TCK materials from Sun/Oracle, not from >> JBoss. I haven't looked at this in any detail. >> >> --kevan > Hi Donald, > > should I commit the subproject bval-tck-runner created by Carlos into > svn under trunk/bval/ or are there any doubts about that? (for Jira > issue BVAL-16) > > Roman >
