Carlos Vara (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-29?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862369#action_12862369 ]
Carlos Vara commented on BVAL-29:
---------------------------------

Thanks for reviewing Donald. I will add the header and include new file 
additions in the patch in future fixes.

Also, I usually separate the patches per project as I have them checked out 
individually. If you prefer them to be from the root of the svn just tell me.

Defer node creation in implementation of ConstraintViolationBuilder API
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

                Key: BVAL-29
                URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-29
            Project: BeanValidation
         Issue Type: Bug
         Components: jsr303
   Affects Versions: 0.1-incubating
           Reporter: Carlos Vara
           Assignee: Donald Woods
            Fix For: 0.1-incubating

        Attachments: bval-jsr303.patch, ConstraintValidatorContextTest.java


Call to inIterable() should modify the previous sibling node instead of the 
"current" node, and in case a null named non iterable node is left in the leaf 
of the path, it should never be added.
This behavior is not documented in the JSR-303 spec document, but 
ConstraintValidatorContext Javadoc gives information on how it should work.
Patch includes some tests that serve also as examples of this API usage.
1 more test passes.

Hi Carlos,

I am satisfied with all of your patches in either form. I am glad, that you have the motivation, time and understanding to submit those high-quality patches. I always review them anyway and I, for my part, have no problems with adding missing stuff.

So, what I wanted so say: Thanks for your work! Do you think, that most/all the TCK tests, that fail can be fixed with minor changes like those, that you have fixes so far? I am afraid, that especially those about XML meta data, would cause more work before they pass....

Regards, Roman

Reply via email to