[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-45?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12868218#action_12868218
 ] 

Carlos Vara commented on BVAL-45:
---------------------------------

I'm currently cleaning the code of a big patch that solves group sequence 
processing for when this is merged/discarded :-)

> ValidationException must be thrown when validating a bean with an annotated 
> method which isn't a valid getter
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BVAL-45
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-45
>             Project: BeanValidation
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jsr303
>    Affects Versions: 0.1-incubating
>            Reporter: Carlos Vara
>         Attachments: bval-jsr303-45.patch
>
>
> This one has its problems because it clashes directly with the 
> MethodValidation implementation. I provide a candidate patch that follows the 
> spec and doesn't break our extra functionality, please review it.
> Supplied patch:
> - Forces correct behavior of bean validation according to the spec: that is, 
> a ValidationException is thrown. So, if you want to validate a bean which 
> also has an annotated method, the implementation will follow the spec and 
> throw an exception.
> - Method validation works, but it is slower than before as constraint 
> descriptions are no longer cached. This can be fixed, I just left this for 
> later as I prefer to concentrate in TCK tests and I also would like to gather 
> opinions as if this is the correct route or you have a better idea for this.
> - 1 more TCK test passes.
> So, to sum it up, if this patch is merged, don't mix annotated fields/getters 
> with annotated methods in the same class. On the bright side, constructor 
> annotations can be mixed.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to