One of the sentences got split: "The results may vary between different versions of the generator though, so to replicate them one will need to match both the config settings and the SVN/release version"
Regards, Carlos On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Carlos Vara <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello again, > > current project in the sandbox now can generate a JSR-303 annotated bean > graph with groups, inheritance and complex constraints, so it can simulate > realistic scenarios. Only big missing aspect would be arrays/iterables > support, but IMHO it won't make a difference in test results. > > Current tests check the performance of a jsr-303 impl on these operations: > - Parsing beans. > - Validating already parsed beans. > - Combined parsing+validating speed. > - Multi-threaded validation of parsed beans. > > To run the benchmark, simply execute: > mvn test > > The bean generator procedure is configurable, there is a list of all > the modifiable properties in generator.default.properties. You can modify > them in the commandline as: > mvn -Dgenerator.numBeans=5 -Dgenerator.inheritanceratio=0.2 > -Dtester.numthreads=8 > > Tests should be reproducible, as the bean generation algorithm will return > the same beans if executed with the same parameters. The results may vary > between different versions of the generator though, so the > > If there is no opposition, during the weekend I will benchmark our 0.1 > release against hibernate validator 4.1.0.CR1 and post the results in my > blog. > > Regards, > Carlos > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Carlos Vara <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have committed to the sandbox a simple project to evaluate the >> performance of a jsr303 implementation. It's in a very initial status and >> only benchmarks the parsing and validation of beans with basic properties >> and nested beans. I intend to add groups/group sequences, nested constraints >> and possibly inheritance to make it more exhaustive. >> >> Any opinion / review of the code is very welcomed. Also, I have little >> experience on the best practices integrating a custom code generator in >> maven, so any help with that part would be very appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> Carlos >> > >
