Hi all, thanks a lot for the feedbacks, exactly the part of spec pointed by Gerhard suggested me to ask that question, I'll change a little the guice support to be more compliant to the spec recommendation. Thanks!!! Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Gerhard <[email protected]> wrote: > hi, > > the spec. is quite concrete - see 4.1. Validator API: >> It is recommended to leave the caching of Validator instances to the > ValidatorFactory. Validator implementations are thread-safe. > > regards, > gerhard > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > 2010/8/1 Roman Stumm <[email protected]> > >> It should be thread-safe, when not documented otherwise in the javadoc >> comment of the class. >> >> >> On 01.08.2010 19:25, Matt Benson wrote: >> >>> Simone, >>> While familiarizing myself with the code I've thus far not seen anything >>> to indicate a lack of thread-safety in either the core or jsr303 modules. >>> >>> HTH, >>> Matt >>> >>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Sorry, >>>> I meant Validator :P >>>> Simo >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Simone Tripodi >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi guys! >>>>> taking a look once again at the code, I got in trouble if the >>>>> Validation implementation os thread-safety... can anyone help me >>>>> please? >>>>> The reply would influence some details in the guice module I would >>>>> like to fix before the 0.2 release, thanks in advance! >>>>> Simo >>>>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
