[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913440#action_12913440
]
Roman Stumm edited comment on BVAL-81 at 9/22/10 3:36 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------
An example would be helpful, that shows what the *expected behavior* should be.
A reproducer would be great.
Would you expect the Method object itself as rootBean of the
ConstraintViolation? see MethodValidatorImpl#validateParameters, line 180
was (Author: romanstumm):
An example would be helpful, that shows what the *expected behavior* should
be. A reproducer would be great.
Would you expect the Method object itself as rootBean of the
ConstraintViolation?
> No context provided when validating methods
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BVAL-81
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-81
> Project: BeanValidation
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jsr303
> Affects Versions: 0.1-incubating, 0.2-incubating
> Reporter: David J. M. Karlsen
>
> When validating method executions no constraints are provided:
> [ConstraintViolationImpl{rootBean=null, propertyPath='', message='may not be
> empty', leafBean=[], value=[]}]
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
