nope, no issue. 

1st argument: we didn't split between PMC and committers in bval so far. Each 
committer is also on the PMC. We don't even have an own bval-pmc LDAP group 
right now ;) (we might go on and change this for the TLP)


2nd argument: the TLPs roles are defined in the graduation statement. You got 
lots of +1 (easily the majority) when we discussed this back then. And the 
graduation resolution proposal which we internally voted on had you appointed 
as PMC chair already. And since no one voted -1 ...


LieGrue,
strub



----- Original Message -----
> From: Matt Benson <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 9:58 PM
> Subject: Re: graduation proposal in the wiki
> 
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  Hi!
>> 
>>  For making it easier to review and tweak the proposal, I copied it over to 
> out wiki
>> 
>> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BeanValidation/Graduation+Proposal
>> 
>>  I think we can easily start the actual VOTE tomorrow as the discuss already 
> turned out well. Any objections?
> 
> Does anyone see any issue with my being named to the PMC, and as
> chair, while technically never having been added to the PPMC?
> 
> Matt
> 
>> 
>> 
>>  LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
> 

Reply via email to