All: I agree with Ron on this. The wording is fine. Leave it alone. Gerald (Jerry) Muller KF5EYC [email protected]
In a message dated 8/11/2014 11:34:46 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: The current web form does not have any mention of Family relationship roles. It simply says Additional Family Member. Don’t think that needs to change. 73, Ron, K5HM [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) _www.qrz.com/db/k5hm_ (http://www.qrz.com/db/k5hm) From: Eddie Runner [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 11:22 AM To: 'Cameron'; 'Bob Tomlinson' Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 'Michael Wrenn'; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 'Ross Lawler'; 'Rick Hiller'; 'Nathan Vessey'; [email protected]; 'Kirk Kendrick KK2Z'; 'John Chauvin' Subject: RE: By Law changes the current membership form is here http://www.bvarc.org/index.php?page=membership it has a spot for only one additional family member. I imagine, one of the reasons past BODs made a membership lower in cost was because we didn’t have to mail a second newsletter to the same household. Now, the question may be, how many associate members can be attached to one normal member? spouse, three kids, or buy one get one associate, or anyone in the household? Maybe, if the newsletter is the official notification to our members ANY associate members would HAVE TO BE in the same household for notification purposes..?? We have the form in PDF and also in HTML on the website. Redoing the web form is going to be simple and wont take long but I will need a little guidance on wording.. Eddie (NU5K) From: Cameron [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 10:24 AM To: Bob Tomlinson Cc: [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) ; [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) ; [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) ; [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) ; Michael Wrenn; [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) ; [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) ; [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) ; [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) ; [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) ; [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) ; [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) ; Ross Lawler; Rick Hiller; Nathan Vessey; [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) ; Kirk Kendrick KK2Z; John Chauvin Subject: By Law changes Hi All, I’ve been told that, if the by laws pass, they will become effective immediately. This is impractical because we need to have time to revise forms and make several changes to the web site. The procedure for applying for a family membership needs to be changed. We need some way to enforce the rules and I can’t think of a good way to implement the rules concerning the relationship between the primary and family member. Note that the word spouse is a relationship which does not include “domestic partnerships.” I think that we have a small number of such relationships. How is this to be enforced? I handle much of the membership transactions and prefer to not have to be a “marriage cop” (this is technically Bob’s problem). Perhaps, adding a statement to the membership form requiring a statement as to the type of relationship exists in an associates situation? Cam
_______________________________________________ BVARC mailing list [email protected] http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
