If we’re waiting for even 3% of youth to join us just because we think Ham 
Radio is “fun,” we’re wasting our remaining days on a dying hobby. If we want 
what we do to be meaningful enough for somebody to carry it forward, it must 
have relevancy.

 

From: BVARC [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Guthrie via 
BVARC
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 15:44
To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB
Subject: Re: [BVARC] Youth in Amateur Radio

 

20 years ago, the hot thing in certain amateur (please, not "amature") radio 
circles was the Microchip PIC processor and everybody was doing stuff with 
BASIC stamps.  The Arduino is basically a ripoff of the BASIC stamp based upon 
the AVR microprocessor rather than the PIC and with certain fairly logical 
enhancements.  Now, I happen to like the AVR part better than the PIC, but you 
can't say hams are behind the times because they don't use Arduino when we were 
doing that sort of thing 15 years before anyone had ever thought of the Arduino.

The KX3 is not considered an SDR radio precisely because it doesn't require an 
external computer.  It might use DSP in it's design, but that's been pretty 
common, in top-end rigs at least, for a long time so it's not something to 
expect, it's a historical fact.

I spent quite a long time with the FCC rules a couple of months ago to prove 
that HF Digital Voice is already permitted by the rules, and they are a marvel 
of clarity and brevity when compared to the ITU rules that define the emission 
types.

I think that trying to market amateur radio to young gadget freaks and people 
who are interested in the current state of the art technology-wise is a huge 
mistake because they're never going to be impressed with what we have to offer 
them.  Even if we had high-speed data transmissions everywhere, the people who 
might want to do that are already doing it without having to take a test to get 
a license and without having to spend hundreds of dollars on specialized gear.  
I think it's time that the amateur radio community recognized that it is not 
primarily of interest to the technically-oriented, but is far more interesting 
to the socially-oriented.

It's not amateur data communications or amateur computer programming or amateur 
electronics, it's amateur radio, and we do it because we think it's fun.

On 10/8/2014 6:11 PM, Bryce Lindsay via BVARC wrote:

I keep trying to reply, but things keep getting in the way. 

 

 

Ok, stagnant is a bit harsh of a word.  But the wheels of progress can be a bit 
slow to adopt new technologies it seems.  Slow in comparison to other hobbies 
that can benefit from this same new technology.  Arduinos, Raspberry Pi's have 
been out for a few years now, yet it feels they only really started getting 
traction in the amature radio community recently.  

 

I feel that SDR will be playing a BIG part in the future of Amature radio, 
their are some SDR devices out there that some of the maker community are just 
now getting their hands on.  But the gulf between the maker community and the 
"Traditional" amature radio community seems to be extremely vast.   

 

There are radio's like the KX3, a SDR radio, but you don't need a PC to use it. 
 I expect more manufacturers for follow this model.  

​ 

As for the slow digital modes, and the 300baud artificial speed limit, yes it's 
things like that that seem to hold back progress.   Also spend any length of 
time with the current FCC rules and regulations about type, class, and 
transmissions and you will want to gouge your eyes out.

 

one example of a digital mode that was killed from experimenting with here in 
the states was ROS.  a multi QSO digital chat mode.  Because the creator used 
the term "spread spectrum" in describing his new mode, this mode was killed 
even before it got the chance to be used in the states.   Even though from what 
my reading has revealed it uses no more bandwidth of a voice USB signal, and 
multiple QSO's all interacting with each other like an IRC chat room, using 
something like this, would be right up a younger persons alley.   

 

As a new operator, i have found a few places on the net that are more in touch 
with what i am wanting to get from this hobby.  One place that i check on on a 
regular basis, 

 

http://www.reddit.com/r/amateurradio

 

If you're looking for your younger hams, thats the place to look.

 

Also I truly feel that the current US license structure is doing more harm than 
good to new hams.  New hams are almost exclusively regulated to UHF/VHF.  A new 
ham these days has no morse skills, so saying that they have access to the HF 
stuff is a little bit of a misnomer.   Instead of limiting new hams to CW on 
the HF stuff, limit their bandwidth, so they could at least use digital modes.  
And their computer skills that most of them know how to use already.

 






_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org






-- 
Jonathan Guthrie KA8KPN
_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

Reply via email to