Let’s think through the problem.

What is a choke?

It’s an inductor. All inductors have reactance that is a function of the 
frequency in question. The reason that we call a given inductor a “choke” is 
that it provides a high-impedance relative to the frequency in question. Thus 
something that might not be a choke at 14MHz is most definitely a choke at 
144MHz.

At the given frequency, the inductor presents a very, very high impedance to 
the signal.

Placing a shunt between the center conductor and the shield can be 
characterized as having a low impedance for signals from DC up to some point 
and then an increasing impedance as a function of frequency. In other words, at 
DC, it looks like a short.

So, when we pass 14MHz, it doesn’t see the choke. It looks like a very big 
resistor.

The amount of static that is dissipated is a function of the ohmic resistance 
of the choke and the charge on the center relative to the shield.

NOW, consider lightning surges of the INDIRECT kind. They are not simple, DC 
sparks. They have a leading edge and then a 120kHz or so “ring”. It might be a 
good idea to calculate the inductance needed that will provide a high-impedance 
to our RF signals, but a low impedance as possible below say, 150-200kHz.

In this way, lightning energy flying into our antenna would have a chance to be 
shunted to the shield/ground as well as DC components.

Ultimately, this really becomes a parallel LC network with some of the C being 
an arc device <grin>.

*
Xl = 2 pi f L

Let’s say we want 1M ohms at 14mHz:

L = Xl / 2 pi f = 1,000,000/ 2 pi 14,000,000 = 0.01137 Henry

or 113.7 mH

Now, what is this value at 120kHz?

Xl = 2 pi 120,000 0.01137 = 8572 ohms

I’m sure Rick Hiller will check my math.

The point is that a given coil has vastly different impedance at decades of 
frequency difference.

B

Bill Crowell, N4HPG
Pearland, TX
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
I prefer to live a life of galvanic isolation.

_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

Reply via email to